(My thoughts in this post may not break new ground in narrative studies or be foreign to readers of AMV. I share them, however, as part of my continued project to elaborate a uniquely Mormon vision of language by exploring what uniquely Mormon textsâ€”LDS scripture, in particularâ€”can teach about the value and work of words.)
In Almaâ€™s discourse on faith, he spends a great deal of time elaborating his central conceit. After exploring the need for humility and dispelling the notion that to place faith in something is to know that thing completely, he calls his audience to make a place in their being where they could at least receive and consider the character of his words. Then he introduces his extended metaphor: â€œwe will compare the word unto a seed.â€ He continues by outlining some criteria for the seedâ€™s growth: it needs to be planted, it needs to be a healthy seed, and it needs to not be tinkered with but left to interact with the soil.
My focus in this brief note is on Almaâ€™s statement about the seedâ€™s healthâ€”â€œif it be a true seed, or a good seedâ€â€”and what his language (as I read it) can teach us about narrative ethics.
The structure of the statement suggests that Alma felt compelled to modify the adjective he wanted to describe the seed. His rhetorical move prioritizes â€œgoodâ€ over â€œtrue,â€ a priority supported by the fact that he uses â€œgoodâ€ not â€œtrueâ€ through the rest of the discourse. Almaâ€™s revision of this condition suggests to me that there may be more value in privileging the goodness of words, the character of language, over their truthâ€”their supposed correlation to reality. In this light, maybe the questions we should ask about a narrative arenâ€™t â€œIs it true?â€ or â€œHow true is it?â€ but â€œIs it good?â€ or â€œWhat good does it do or encourage its audience to do?â€
The prioritization of a narrativeâ€™s goodness over its truth is an act of privileging narrative function and ethics over narrative content. Many people (includingâ€”maybe especiallyâ€”Mormons) focus on the latter over the former; Alma suggests that we should flip that focus and attend to how words act upon us as individuals and social groups. He wants us, then, to see language and narrative as moral acts that can change us, our relationships, and the world.