. . . especially when they’re made with death,” says Mister Tim, the quirkiest voice in a cappella music.
I’ve known Mister Tim for more than 5 years and witnessed many artistic incarnations. The earliest (for me) was as our ward choir director. Intense, focused, squinting with the effort of tweaking our voices into a semblance of harmony and with one ear always turned toward the choir Mister Tim–er, I mean, Brother Tim–did his own arrangements of hymns and sang all the music as if it were being performed for the first time every time. Ward members still talk about his performance of “O, Holy Night.”
The next incarnation, which he had been inhabiting since college, was Moosebutter. Like most college a cappella bands Moosebutter focused on and perfected the silliness inherent in singing “classic” music, like “Popcorn Popping”, with that characteristic BYU-comedy flair. They were big with the ten year olds and all their parents for being able to comically riff on everything from Harry Potter to Spam to Jon Williams (who is most definitely the man), for which they were nominated for a People’s Choice Award.
From there Mister Tim went on to work on the Vegas Strip and put together, manage, and perform in many other a cappella groups. When his stint in Vegas ended and he and his family rolled back into Colorado he came with yet another incarnation: Vocal Magic.
Vocal Magic is a multifaceted one man show that hinges on Mister Tim’s prodigious vocal textures, far-reaching vocal range, and his ability to work three sound effect pedals that enable to sing with himself and mix his voice in real time–a process called live looping. Part stand-up comedy, part poetry slam, and part performance art, Vocal Magic was like nothing I had ever seen before. My first thought: If T.S. Eliot could have sang and Allan Ginsberg had known how to beatbox and been stuck in one body, they could have been reincarnated as Mister Tim. Vocal Magic was like nothing I’d ever seen but it was definitely something I wished to see again.
Mr. Tim graciously agreed to be interviewed. His answers were thorough enough and thought-provoking enough that I split the interview into two parts. Here’s part one.
LHC: How are you feeling today? (Fuzzy, spacey, ???)
Mr. T: Perpendicular.
LHC: Tell me about the modern a cappella scene. Until I saw your show whenever I thought of a cappella I always thought of those guys from “Where in the World is Carmen San Diego?” How has a cappella grown and changed?
Mr. T:There is a great deal of detail and nuance to this answer. â€œA Cappellaâ€ to most people, I think, means Rockapella (Carmen San Diego), or a barbershop quartet, or a college group like BYUâ€™s Vocal Point, or, more and more frequently, â€œGLEEâ€ (even though there has only been one actual a cappella song on that show). But, even Rockapella, still touring the world 15 years after Carmen San Diego went off the air, is nothing like they were on that show: [now] they are a technology-dependent pop act. There are groups that use stacks and stacks of expensive sound gear, like Naturally 7 who are touring with Michael Buble.
Really there are three ways to define â€œa cappellaâ€: 1) the most basic– meaning any music performed without
instruments, regardless of style (including when rock bands sing a section of their song without instruments, like the beginning of Queenâ€™s â€œBohemian Rhapsodyâ€); 2) what seems to be the popular interpretation of a cappella, which is the Rockapella version, or the college a cappella version, or even the barbershop version, which carries a fragrance of dorkiness; 3) and â€œcontemporaryâ€ a cappella, which is a movement of modern musicians doing modern music at a very high level, usually incorporating vocal percussion, and usually depending on technology to create the same auditory punch as a â€˜realâ€™ band.
My history in a cappella really follows the progression of contemporary a cappella. I listened to The Kingâ€™s Singers (classical) in high school, saw BYUâ€™s Vocal Point at one of BYUâ€™s very first a cappella jams; I had friends bootlegging a cappella radio programs onto cassette tapes and passing them around; I was introduced, through rumor at first, to The House Jacks, and then by the late 90â€™s to m*pact. I started attending a cappella conferences, and growing less satisfied with the traditional a cappella standard and wantingâ€¦ more. And there were groups doing more, and I gravitated to them. Then I started making my own groups, and have been skewing further and further from â€œtraditionalâ€ a cappella since then, although I still keep the traditional stuff around because it makes $.
When most people call me wanting to hire â€œan a cappella group,â€ they want something like early 90â€™s Rockapella, or like a college group. Recognizable covers, bare-bones vocal sound, oftenthey want something a little corny (which is part of that old-school a cappellaâ€¦ thing).
LHC: What attracted you to live looping? How is it different from traditional a cappella?
Mr. T: My wife and I used to joke that I was constantly disappointed with the other singers in my groups because what I really wanted was for all the singers in my group to be me. Well, looping lets me do that! I get to sing everything just the way I want it sung, and I donâ€™t have to wait for other people to learn their parts.
Other reasons I started live-looping: a) I want to go out and perform as often as possible, but couldnâ€™t get the other people in my groups to go all the time; b) There are lots of paid shows that come up that donâ€™t pay enough for a whole group, but are good money for just one person; c) I saw other people do it, and it looked like fun.
But, one of the biggest factors: I love teaching. I love teaching. The problem with the kind of teaching I do, where I drop in and talk to kids in their regular music classes, or in assemblies, or at music festivals, is that if they donâ€™t know who I am, they donâ€™t care about what I have to say. If Iâ€™m there with a group, they hear the group sing, they think itâ€™s cool, then theyâ€™ll listen. But I want to be teaching as often as possible, visiting classes, flying out to music festivals, showing up at concerts. I canâ€™t afford to fly a whole group out to these kinds of things for free, which most of them demand (even the big a cappella festivals where I teach I have to pay my own way there unless Iâ€™m one of the headline performers). But now that Iâ€™ve got a solo act, I can drop in on a class with my small sound system that takes less than 5 minutes to set up, sing a couple of songs,
the kids think itâ€™s cool, and then when I speak, my words matter. Itâ€™s a pedagogical thing.
Artistically, what attracts me now to continue live-looping is that it really is rare to have one person doing looping with just the voice. Novelty factor, and if done well and if we find the market Iâ€™ve got a corner on the market. I do enjoy the constraints: a lot of my material has developed to address specific issues of how to keep the show from being boring, dealing with the repetitive nature of the loop, not being able to change the music once itâ€™s laid down without completely starting over. Limiting, yes, but has forced me to adapt in ways and to develop new approaches to my performing that I think have greatly improved the overall impact of my
LHC: I know you’re a fan of all types of music, but what musicians and songs/works have stuck with you over the years?
Mr. T: The 3 Bâ€™s: Bach, Beethoven, Barenaked Ladies (I donâ€™t like Brahms); Midnight Oil; Kingston Trio; Manheim Steamroller; Spike Jones; Weird Al Yankovic; Alan Sherman; Smothers Brothers; Brandon Flowers; John Adams
To be continued, but while you are waiting feel free to enjoy this: