<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two events and three cool links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motleyvision.org/2009/two-events-and-three-cool-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motleyvision.org/2009/two-events-and-three-cool-links/</link>
	<description>Mormon Arts and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:46:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Langford</title>
		<link>http://www.motleyvision.org/2009/two-events-and-three-cool-links/comment-page-1/#comment-35433</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motleyvision.org/?p=1642#comment-35433</guid>
		<description>I read the link to the Asher Lev production review. Interesting stuff. Thanks for posting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the link to the Asher Lev production review. Interesting stuff. Thanks for posting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.motleyvision.org/2009/two-events-and-three-cool-links/comment-page-1/#comment-35422</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motleyvision.org/?p=1642#comment-35422</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d put economics on Scott Card&#039;s &quot;stay away from&quot; list. The most inaccurate article of his I&#039;ve read (and the one that betrays ignorance of the subject the most) was an attempt he wrote (10 or so years ago) to explain why it was economically unwise for women to work.

In this case, the &lt;i&gt;Mobility in 2088&lt;/i&gt; video is so devoid of actual substance that there is no danger of anyone looking foolish. But I doubt that is Card&#039;s fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d put economics on Scott Card&#8217;s &#8220;stay away from&#8221; list. The most inaccurate article of his I&#8217;ve read (and the one that betrays ignorance of the subject the most) was an attempt he wrote (10 or so years ago) to explain why it was economically unwise for women to work.</p>
<p>In this case, the <i>Mobility in 2088</i> video is so devoid of actual substance that there is no danger of anyone looking foolish. But I doubt that is Card&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

