Art: Kathryn Abajian on painter Ella Peacock

3.11.05 | | 8 comments

The University of Utah Press has just published “First Sight of the Desert: Discovering the Art of Ella Peacock” by Bay Area author Kathryn Abajian. The book — which combines memoir and biography — focuses on the life and art of Peacock, a relatively unknown 20th century Utah painter.

Abajian agreed to answer a few questions about the book (which can be ordered from University of Utah Press). Also note that Abajian will be involved in a series of readings and events related to the book — including the opening of an exhibit of Peacock’s work later this year at the Museum of Utah Art and History.

I doubt that many AMV readers have ever heard of Ella Peacock. Would you mind telling us a little bit about her?

Many people outside of the art community in Utah haven’t heard of Ella Peacock. She was the sort of person who hid her light under the bushel of privacy. She was modest, unassuming and unusual, especially in the small Mormon community of Spring City where she lived.

She was raised on the east coast, in Germantown, near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Like lots of easterners, I imagine, she pictured the West as a place of great potential. In fact, she said, “Of all my family, I wanted to move west the most and I was the last to leave!” She attended the Philadelphia School of Design for Women on scholarship and graduated in 1927, then put aside her painting just to survive the Depression. She married late, then ended up supporting her small family (one son) working as a draftsman for twenty-eight years. It wasn’t until she finally moved west that she began to paint seriously. Then she blossomed!

How did you first become aware of Peacock and her work? And — related to that, how did the book come about?

I learned about Ella Peacock accidentally. I was driving around Sanpete County one day and took a side road to Spring City, National Historic District, according to an old wooden sign on Highway 89. This was in 1980 and my husband was from Sanpete County. I was there with our family on a summer visit. So that afternoon, I practically stumbled on an amazing woman with a house full of wonderful art. Walking into her house that day changed my day and the next decade of my life.

I didn’t start thinking about writing a book until years later. I think it was when I learned that Ella had donated a large number of paintings to BYU’s new Museum of Art and she was in her eighties. I thought it would be important to document her life, so art students, at least, would know her story. So when I was on summer break, for many years, I visited Ella in Spring City and the documentation grew. It didn’t become a book for many years.

A few examples of Peacock’s work can be seen on . But how would you describe her paintings?

Her paintings look as though they’re painted in another century practically. They are nothing like current styles of representational or impressionist art. The reason is that Ella painted in the style she knew, the one she learned in the 1920s. So her work documents important history in the old buildings of Sanpete County and the Utah desert’s ageless landscape, sights you can see today, but in a style from another era. Her work is most like other Philadelphia regional impressionists, one group especially — The Philadelphia Ten — a group of women who were a generation before Ella and some of whom she knew from art school. Her paintings evoke the California impressionists from the early part of the 20th century as well, paintings that came about during the Arts and Crafts Movement. In fact, Ella lived many of the ideals of that movement.

The blurb on your Web site suggests that you approached the book as part biography, part personal essay? Is that a fair characterization? How do your own experiences figure into the book?

Yes, the book blends memoir and biography. I’d originally intended to write a straight biography and actually completed an entire draft. Then I started getting questions from my writers’ group, from editors and anyone who read any of it, actually, asking about my involvement in Ella’s story. So many people wanted to know why I was interested in her and her work. To me that was like asking why I like art or why I read. It seemed a given to me, especially that anyone who met Ella would be fascinated by her and would want to know more. Right about that time, I met the perfect editor, Dawn Marano, who worked then for the University of Utah Press as Acquisitions Editor and worked occasionally as a developmental editor. She made the difference — encouraged me to find the nexus of my life experience and Ella’s. She was unfailingly supportive and insightful.

So the book developed slowly. It became what it is — a narrative structured around ten of Ella’s images, each one lending a theme for a chapter. In each chapter, I try to tell two stories — Ella’s and mine. During the years I came to know Ella, my entire personal and professional life changed dramatically — notably, I left a marriage and a church I’d long known. But it was only in the reflection that writing requires that I realized that the impact of those changes was directly influenced by, and symbolic of, my quest to know Ella.

What role did Mormonism play in Peacock’s life?

Ella was a Mormon woman who did exactly what she wanted to do, an unusual concept to me at the time (when I met her, I’d been a converted member of the church for nearly thirty years). She and her husband converted when she was in her late fifties, but she never completely assimilated into the rules and responsibilities that typical church membership implies. She told me she was drawn to the church because of her slight exposure to it in the 1930s on a road trip west. And she told me she really wanted to learn about the church because she wanted to learn about schools in Utah for her son to attend. My research told me much more about her motivations. Ella was the sort of woman who didn’t tolerate frivolity in any form and, though she remained “true” to the church’s teachings for the most part, she didn’t embrace the social lifestyle aspects of it.

How was her work received while she was alive? What was her reaction to the public reaction to her work?

Ella’s work was well received when she was alive, but her attitude toward marketing her work nearly sabotaged it. She was a very private person and didn’t enjoy (and refused to attend) art openings. She enjoyed the honor and loved being appreciated, but she was uncomfortable in social situations.

As she aged and her memory and hearing failed, she worried that she wouldn’t be able to communicate intelligently at a reception. Thus, when Robert Redford asked her to participate a second year at his Sundance Institute art exhibit, she refused. She even felt uncomfortable when a San Francisco gallery owner wanted to exhibit (and sell) her paintings and recalled them only weeks after sending them to San Francisco. She couldn’t be cajoled to attend the opening reception of an exhibit, called Eighty Something at Art Access Gallery that showed many of her paintings, even though she was offered chocolate and a nice hotel room.

Most people who own an Ella Peacock painting today will tell you a charming story of the process of acquiring it. She wasn’t readily inclined to sell paintings, and needed to be sure each painting went to the right home. But when she got to know and like someone, she would give her paintings away.

Thanks, Kathryn!

UPDATE 3.12.05: The best way to order the book is not from the University of Chicago Press Distribution Center (as originally reported), but directly from University of Utah Press. Or look for it at your local independent bookstore.

8 comments: “Art: Kathryn Abajian on painter Ella Peacock

  1. Anonymous

    Very interesting interview, William. Peacock’s personality reminds me somewhat of Juanita Brooks. I remember a Peacock painting on the cover of an issue of Dialogue in the 1990s. 

    Posted by Justin

  2. Anonymous

    Great job, William. Having spent quite a bit of time in Kathryn’s home and among Peacock’s paintings, I can attest to Peacock’s talent as an artist. I look forward to reading the book.  

    Posted by Greg

  3. Anonymous

    The Dialogue issue with a Peacock painting on the cover is 32:1; it also contains an article by Abajian. Find it here .

    Posted by Greg

  4. Anonymous

    Great post. I’d enjoy more of these – getting to know the good LDS art out there. We’re going to start buying prints soon and I must admit that most of the paintings/prints that are LDS oriented don’t exactly drop my socks. I think the aesthetics of the general suburban Mormon just isn’t mine. And it is sometimes hard to find art that both my wife and I agree upon. 

    Posted by Clark

  5. Anonymous

    In the interest of full disclosure: Greg tipped me off to the publication of the book so part of the credit goes to him.

    Posted by William Morris

  6. Anonymous

    Great post! Sorry that I missed it earlier. I actually met Ella Peacock when I was a kid. I remember her as a fiesty old lady whose living room smelled of oil paints. My parents have a marvelous painting of hers of the Manti Temple that I have every intention of inheriting some day. (There will be a mean and nasty fight when my parents die over their art collection among the siblings ;->)

    One of the wonderful things about Peacock is that she also made the frames for her painints. Wonderful, hand carved and hand pained stuff.

    Peacock’s work is wonderful! 

    Posted by Nate Oman

  7. Anonymous


    Clearly the solution is for the art collection to be bequeathed to an outside party with a well-developed sense of aesthetics and with the taste to know exactly how and where to display each piece.

    You know, someone like me.

    The Oman siblings, of course, would be free to arrange visits to the collection. I’ll even provide glasses of lemonade or ginger ale [although those will have to be consumed well away from the paintings].

    Does your mom read AMV? I think that this is a perfect solution.  

    Posted by William Morris

NOTE: if you haven't commented at AMV before, your comment will go into moderation. Once it's been approved further comments will post automatically.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *